After referring to the provisions of Articles 338(3), 340(1), 341 and 342, the Court proceeded to hold as follows: (SCR p.458)
“It would thus be seen that this provision contemplates that some Backward Classes may by the Presidential order be included
It may be appropriate to quote the relevant holding from the judgment:
“When Art. 15(4) refers to the special provision for the advancement of certain classes or scheduled castes or scheduled tribes, it must not be ignored that the provision which is authorised to be made
It may be appropriate to quote the relevant holding from the judgment: (SCR pp.467, 470)
“When Article 15(4) refers to the special provision for the advancement of certain classes or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, it must not be ignored that the provision which is authorised to be made
The Privy Council observed:
“It may be well to add that their Lordships judgment does not imply that every sum paid under mistake is recoverable
The Privy Council observed: (IA p.302, para 17)
“It may be well to add that their Lordships’ judgment does not imply that every sum paid under mistake is recoverable
* The changes have been highlighted
b. The exact page and paragraph number as in the original treatises/reference material is inserted.
Raw text obtained from Registry:
SCC Page: