Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 2.djvu/779

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
ASK—ASM
713

mere passing inroad, but a permanent occupation of the country, in which they established themselves in such numbers that they have ever since formed the predominant element in the population, and have to a great extent supplanted or absorbed all the previously existing races. But the dynasty of the house of Seljuk, established by the first conqueror Soliman, who had fixed his capital at Nice, within 100 miles of Constantinople, did not long retain its undivided sovereignty, and its power was broken by the armies of the first Crusade (1097 A.D.), which took Nice, defeated the Turks in a great battle at Doryltcum, and then swept over the land almost without opposition, up to the very walls of Antioch. The Byzantine emperor recovered possession of the whole circuit of the coast, from Trebizond to the Syrian gates; and the Seljukian sultans of Roum, as they termed themselves, who had removed their capital to Iconium, in the heart of the interior, found themselves cut off from the sea on all sides. Their domi nion svas gradually broken up, and divided among a number of small independent chieftains, until the rise of the Ottoman dynasty at the commencement of the 14th century once more consolidated the power of the Turks in Asia. The history of Asia Minor from this period is in separably connected with that of the Turkish empire, and will be given under the head of Turkey. To the same article we must refer our readers for the modern division of the country and the present system of administration, as well as for such statistical information concerning its present state as it is possible to collect in the absence of

all official or trustworthy authorities.


At the commencement of the present century our information concerning Asia Minor was extremely imperfect. The survey of the southern coast by Captain Beaufort (published in his Karamania, 4to, Lond. 1817), was the first contribution to a sound knowledge of any part of the country; and the work of Colonel Leake (Journal of a Tour in Asia Minor, 8vo, Lond. 1824), in which he embodied a careful review of all the information then existing, and applied it to the comparative geography of the peninsula, became the basis of all subsequent researches. Since then the labours of successive travellers have thrown a great deal of light upon the subject, and most parts of the peninsula.have been visited and described, though the materials for a good map are still wanting, and there exists no satisfactory geographical or geological description of many parts of the country. For further information and details our readers may consult Arundel s Visit to the Seven Churches, 8vo, Lond. 1828, and his Discoveries in Asia Minor, 1834 ; Hamilton s Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus, and Armenia, 2 vols. 8vo, Loud. 1842; Fel- lows s Excursion in Asia Minor, Lond. 1839, and his Discoveries in Lycia, Lond. 1841 ; Aiusworth s Travels in Asia Minor, 2 vols., Lond. 1842 ; Spratt and Forbes s Travels in Lycia, 2 vols., Lond. 1847 ; Langlois s Voyage dans la Cilicie, 8vo, 1861 ; C. T. Newton, Travels and Discoveries in the Levant, 2 vols., Lond. 1867.

The work of M. Tchihatcheff (Asie Mineure Description Phy sique, Statistique, et ArcliAologique, 3 vols., 8vo, Paris, 1853-60), the result of several years explorations in different parts of the country, and the first attempt at a systematic description of Asia Minor, has unfortunately never been completed. The first volume (pub lished in 1853) contains by far the best description that has yet appeared of the physical geography of the whole peninsula ; the second and third are devoted to the meteorology, zoology, and botany ; but those which should have contained the geology and the archaeology have never been published.

(e. h. b.)


Alphabetical Index.

Ala-dagh, 705. Alexander the Great, conquest by, 712. Amanus, Mt., 705. Anatolia, 703. Anti-Taurus, 705. Apollonia, lake of, 709. Argæus, Mt., 705. Asia Minor, its boundaries, name, and dimensions, 703. Axylus, woodless region, 704. Baba-dagh, 706. Bithynians, origin of, 711. Böz-dagh, 706. Bulgar-dagh, 705. Calcus river, 708. Calycadnus river, 708. Cappadocians, origin of the, 711. Carians, origin of the, 711. Cayster river, 708. Cestrus river, 703. Chalybes, 711. Cibyra, 711. Cilician Gates, 705. Climate, 709. Coal, 711. Crusade, the first, 713. Cydnus river, 70!. Demirdji-dagh, 706. Divisions, ancient, 711. Earthquakes, 711. Egerdir Göl, 709. Emir-dagh, 705. Ethnography, 711. Eurymedon river, 708. Fruits, 710. Galatians, origin of the, 711. Geology, 710. Geology of the Taurus,704. Granicus river, 707. Halys river, 707. Hassan-dagh, 705. Hermus river, 708. Herodotus's division of Asia Minor, 711. History, 712. Ida, Mt., 706. Iris river, 707. Iron ores, 711. Katakekaurnene, 710. Kereli GöI, 709. Kurds, 712. Lakes, 709. Latmus, Mt., 706. Lycia, vegetation of, 709. Lycian Taurus, 704. Lycians, origin of the, 711. I.ydian monarchy, 712. Macestus river, 707. Mæander river, 708. Messogis, Mt., 706. Miletopolis, lake of, 709. Mountains, 704-7. Mysians, origin of the, 711. Nictea, lake of, 709. Olympus, Mt., 706. Passes of Taurus, 704. Paryadres, Mt., 707. Pergamus, kingdom of, 712. Persia, conquest by, 712 Pontus, kingdom of, 712. Population, modern, 712. Pyramus river, 708. Rhyndacus river, 707. Rivers, 707-9. Romans, conquest by the, 712. Sangarius river, 707. Sarus river, 708. Scamander river, 707. Seljukian Turks, conquest by the, 712. Sipylus, Mt., 706. Strabo's division of Asia Minor, 711. Sultan-dagh, 705. Table-land, central, 703. Taurus, 704-5. Tmolus, Mt., 706. Turcomans, 712. Tuzlah, salt lake, 704. Vegetable products, 710. Vegetation, 709. Xanthus river, 703. Vouiouks, 712. Zeybeks, 712. Zoology, 710


 


ASKEW, or Ascue, Anne, one of the numerous sufferers for the cause of the Reformation in the reign of Henry VIII., was a lady of great worth and beauty, of a good family in Lincolnshire, and in correspondence with Queen Catherine Parr and the chief ladies of the court. At first a Roman Catholic, she had gradually become convinced of the falsity of transubstantiation ; and her husband, irritated at her change of religious opinions, compelled her to leave his house. On coming to London to seek for a divorce she was arrested, and interrogated by Chancellor Wriothesley and Bishop Bonner, at the instigation of whom, under threats of torture, she signed a qualified recantation. She was imprisoned, and wrote to the king, says Hume, " that as to the Lord s Supper she believed as much as Christ himself had said of it, and as much of His divine doctrine as the Catholic church had required." But while she could not be brought to acknowledge the king s explications, this declaration availed her nothing, and was rather regarded as a fresh insult. She was cruelly racked in the presence, and it was said by the hand, of the chancellor himself, in order to extort confession of those ladies about court with whom she corresponded. Her fortitude and fidelity probably saved the lives of the queen and others. She dis closed nothing, although her limbs were so dislocated by the rack that, when condemned to be burnt alive she could not stand, and was carried in a chair to Smith- field, where on IGth July 1546, she and four others underwent this terrible mode of execution with undaunted courage.

ASMAI or Asmayi (full name, Abu Saïd Abd-el-Melek Ibn Koraïb El-Asmaí), is one of the most important representatives of Arabic literature in the 8th

century of the Christian era. He was born at Basra 740 or 741 a.d, and attained, by his extensive erudition, to the high rank of preceptor to Harun al-Rashid, whose court was in that generation the great focus of intellectual activity in the East. Asmai was, as has been happily remarked by Barbier de Meynard, the almost perfect type of those nomadic devotees of literature who, after they had grown pale on the benches of Basra or Kufa, went to com plete their education in the desert, in possession of bound less stores of learning, and yet animated by an enthusiasm for further acquisition, which made them willing to travel across the sands for hundreds of leagues, if only they might preserve an ancient tradition or pick up the fragments of an ancient song. Of the results of his labours he was no niggard, and a long list might be drawn up of his various productions. It is sufficient, however, to mention his synchronous history of the kings of Persia and Arabia previous to Islam a work which Sir Henry Rawlinson has described as " perhaps the most valuable and authentic historic volume in the whole range of Arabian literature " and his wonderful romance of Antar, which might almost

be called the Iliad of the desert. He attained a good old