THEOPHRASTUS tw
/3tcordra<; elvai
(pvecv etepa^
fir]
aXX' e^ avrcop
ael avvapairXripovcrOat, yeXocov av tcrco^ Sokolt) tolavTT) (Tvy/cpLai^ iav <firj>
yap 5
to areXe^of;' avrrj
[Jievrj
tovto
olov viToOeai^; fcai (pvai^ SevSpcop.
fiep
ovv OTTorepQ)^ irore eKreov ovOev av Btevey/cat 7r/909 ra vvv, Ta^a S' av etr] fia/cpo^icoTarov to TrdvTO)^ Svvdfjievov dvTapKetv, &aiTep rj eXda kol Kal
c7T6Xe%efc
tS>
Bv(Tco€0pov<; T?79
76
yLtia?
pi^cov
KaX
7]
oXr]
eTt] Bta/coata,
jUi6po<;
KKrjp^aTd
Ttve^,
6dT€pa
co?
el
5'
oirep iirl tS)v
Trapatpov/jLevcov
tmv
hvvaTai hiajieveiv to crreXe^o?,
^vai^ opioia
oiroaovovv
/cal o/iOLOcpopo^
av
ecr]
TrdvTcov,
(f)aal Be
OTav tjBtj Bokj] KUTa^e peer Bar eTTi^dWeiv fcal fcapTrovaffac tov
iToielv
Te
evtavTov*
tov y^povov,
dvajieTpelv
y^povQV, p^a/cpo^tcoTaTov
Belv ovTO)
tco
SoKel 8e 6 ^lo^
pLi^a<;,
/neTpov
Xeyovau
KaTa
kuI
elvai, KaO^ ov to crreXe^o? Bet ttjv
piaXiGTa nrepX dp^TreXcov
ra?
e')(eiv
TiOevTa
dp'X^rjv
'n-apapXaGTrjcrei
Tjj
p^eTa
Be
TavTa
dpireXov
tt}?
KaTacrKdyfravTa
ireplKaOapai
irdaa^
eirl
Ta<;
pi^a^y cIt epTTXrjaai (f^pvydvcov /cal eirapLrjaaaOaL 6
T7]v
yrjv
a^oBpa,
TovT(p p.ev ovv
Tc3
B
t&
eTei KafC(o<; (pepeiv
v(7Tep(p /SeXTCov,
t&
Be TpLT(p /cal
Aid., 8C. rcau ^i-C^v €/c rwv ahrwv conj. W. such an argument practically assumes the permanence of the trunk, which in the case of the vine can hardly be considered apart from the root. doKoirj rotavrri avyKpiais I ^
€| avTcov
',
^ i.e.
G
conj. from
^iKaLordrr) avyKpiffis MVAld. ; diKaioToirrji crvyKplcTds ^okoltj ejvai rj avyKpicris conj. Sch. ; so in
his earlier edition in his later editions he emends wildly.
U
W.
388