Page:Essay on Crimes and Punishments (1775).djvu/130

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

that it necessarily precedes conviction; but this difference does not destroy a circumstance, which is essential and common to it with all other punishments, viz. that it should never be inflicted, but when ordained by the law. The law should therefore determine the crime, the presumption, and the evidence sufficient to subject the accused to imprisonment and examination. Public report, his flight, his extrajudicial confession, that of an accomplice, menaces, and his constant enmity with the person injured, the circumstances of the crime, and such other evidence, may be sufficient to justify the imprisonment of a citizen. But the nature of this evidence should be determined by the laws, and not by the magistrates, whose decrees are always contrary to political liberty, when they are not particular applications of a general maxim of the public code. When punishments become less severe, and prisons less horrible; when compassion and humanity shall penetrate the iron gates of dungeons, and direct the obdurate and