Page:Essays and studies; by members of the English Association, volume 1.djvu/105

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ON BLIND HARRY'S WALLACE
97

James Douglas under Bruce captured Douglas Castle with the aid of 'Thorn Dicson'; so in the Wallace Sir William Douglas (father of Sir James) with the aid of 'Thorn Dycson'—evidently caught young—captures Sanquhar Castle.[1] William Bunnock in the Bruce uses a stratagem to seize Linlithgow, and in Wallace the hero by the same hay-wain stratagem captures Perth.[2] Bruce having, as above noted, won Linlithgow by an ambush against its 'peill'[3]—constructed, as we know,[4] in 1301—Harry naturally deemed it well to make Wallace take the 'peyll' too,[5] notwithstanding its having been set up after Wallace's brilliant but brief season of victory was ended. Plagiarism is not nearly the word for such literary pillage. Harry nearly uproots Barbour.

The Wallace has for its ground plan a prophecy first intimated by the lines:

Als Inglis clerks in prophecys thai fand
How a Wallace suld putt thaim of Scotland (i. 351),

but later more circumstantially accredited to Thomas the Rymer thus:

Than Thomas said: ' Forsuth, or he decess,
Mony thousand in feild sail mak thar end.
Off this regioune he sail the Sothroun send;
And Scotland thriss he sail bryng to the pess:
So gud off hand agayne sail neuir be kend.'

(ii. 346–50.)

This is the mode by which the expectancy of the reader is started; and the complete fulfilment of the prophecy makes up the story of the Wallace—the tale of Scotland rescued thrice. Yet here again in the prophetic field the trail of

  1. Bruce, v. 279; Wallace, 1575–1655.
  2. Bruce, x. 137–250; Wallace, ix. 695–760.
  3. Bruce, x. 137, 165, 223.
  4. Stevenson's Historical Documents, Scotland, ii. 441; Bain's Calendar, ii. 1308–1422; Neilson's Peel; its meaning and derivation, pp. 5–8.
  5. Wallace, ix. 1693.