Page:Essays and studies; by members of the English Association, volume 1.djvu/13

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

ENGLISH PLACE-NAMES[1]


The Ordnance Map of England contains many thousands of names—names of towns, villages, districts, rivers, mountains, and the like. From the point of view of the unlearned, these names may be divided into two classes: those which have an obvious meaning, and those which have not. As examples of the first class we may take Newcastle, Highbridge, Redhill, and Blackwater. These, and many more, are at once perceived by everybody to be significant, though topographical or historical knowledge may be needed to show the precise reason for which they were given. On the other hand, names like London, Kent, Thames, Helvellyn—in fact, the vast majority of the names on the map—are, to persons not specially instructed, mere arbitrary sequences of sounds, which might just as fitly have been applied to any other places or natural objects as to those which they actually serve to identify. At the same time, no intelligent person can doubt that even these names cannot have been given without some reason, and that if we had only sufficient knowledge we should find them just as significant as those which need no interpretation.

It is natural that curiosity with regard to the meaning of these enigmatical names should be very widely felt, and the writers who have attempted to satisfy this curiosity are innumerable. Unfortunately nearly everything that has been written on the subject is worthless.[2] With very few

  1. This paper is an expansion of a lecture delivered at the London Institution in January, 1907.
  2. Among the few books that can be mentioned as exceptions is the late Canon Isaac Taylor's Names and their Histories. The appendix on English village names in this work is in fact the only good general survey of this