Page:Federal Reporter, 1st Series, Volume 10.djvu/688

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

676 FEDERAL REPORTER. �case is referred back to the master, with liberty to the plaiutiffs to apply to him for leave, to be granted or refiised in his discretion, to give further proofs as to profits, and for a further report from him, based on the principles above laid down. ���Werneb V. Ebinhabdt and another. {Circuit Court, 8. D, Nm York. September 29, 1881.) �1. Design in Tbimming — Infkingement — Injunction. �A design for trimming, produced by embossing on fluting machinery, con- fers the exclusive right to impresa that appearance, and an imitation of the design will be restrained by injunction. �In Equity. �Arthur v. Briesen, for orator. �Jacob L, Hanes, for defendants, �Wheelee, D. J. This suit is brought for relief against infringe- ment of design letters patent No. 11,186, granted to the orator on application made March 19, 1879, for a design for trimming, pro- duced by embossing on fluting machinery, dated May 6, 1879. The orator makes and sells trimming according to his patented design, as he claims it to be, and the defendants admit having made the same thing ; but they set up in defence that the patent does not cover that design ; that the orator was not the original and first prodacer of the design which it does cover; and that so much of the design as they have made use of had been in public use and on sale, with the con- sent and allowance of the orator, for more than two years prior to his application for the patent. �The impression created at the hearing was that the defendants had not, in view of all the evidence on both sides, sustained either of the last two defences by the requisite measure of proof . A careful re- view of all the evidence confirms that impression. The specification and drawings of the patent, taken all together, show a row of em- bossed, smooth, oblong, and half-cylindrical projections between and parallel with two rows of ordinary fluting, which are the prominent and original features of the design, and are what the orator's trim- ming, made under the patent, show. This design is what he invented. It proved attractive, and his patent conferred upon him the exclusive ��� �