CASES REPORTED. ���ARRANQEl) UNDER THEIR RESPECTIVE OIRCUITa AND DISTRICTS. ���FIEST CIECUIT. "^ �CiBcniT CouBT, D. Massachusetts. �Adams V. Bridgewater Iron Co. 179 �ArtUTO, The 308 �Bigelow, First Nat. Bank of �Hannibal, Mo., v 215 �r-idgewater Iron Co., Adams v. 179 �Bryant v. Leyland. 125 �Dormitzer v. Illinois & St. Louis �Bridge Co 217 �First IJat. Bank of Hannibal, �Mo., y. Bigelow 215 �First Nat. Bank of Hannibal, �Mo. V. Smith 215 �Illinois & St. Louis Bridge Co., �Dormitzer v 217 �Insurance Co. of North Amer- ica, Taylor v 410 �Leyland, Bryant v 125 �Matthows V. Warner. 461 �Merriam, Smith v 713, 903 �Smith, First Nat. Bank of Han- nibal, Mo. V. 215 �Smith V. Merriam 713, 903 �Taylor v. Ins. Co. of North �America 410 �United States v. Veazie 867 �Veazie, United States v 867 �Warner, Matthews v 461 �D"STiiicT CouKT, D.Massachusetts. �Davis, United States v 682 �Effle J. Simmons, The 639 �John A. Berkman, The 535 �Mississippi, The 543 �Reed v. Weld 304 �T. 6. ���Pag» �United States v. Davis 682 �Vesta, The 533 �Weld, Reed v 304 �CincoiT Court, D. New Hamp- �SHIEE. �Abbot, Wilbur V 814, 817 �Wilbur V. Abbot 814, 817 �CiKcuiT Couet, d. Rhode Island. �Barnes v. Potter 661 �Barnes v. Steere 661 �Barnea v. Vial 661 �Cozzens, Peckham v 598 �Cozzens, Smith v 598 �Fletcher, Fuller r 128 �FuUer v. Fletcher 128 �Hazard, Rhode Island Hospital �Trust Co.v 119 �Peckliara v. Cozzens 598 �Potter, Barnes v 661 �Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. �V. Hazard 119 �Smith V. Cozzens 598 �Steei-e, Barnes v 661 �Viall, Barnes v 661 ���SECOND CIECUIT. �CrocuiT Court, D. Connecticut. �Bragg, Qriswold v 342 �Electric Raiiroad Signal Co. v. Hall Raiiroad Signal Co 603 �(vii) ��� �
