Page:Final French Struggles in India and on the Indian Seas.djvu/182

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
154
THE ISLE OF FRANCE

her magazines, was transferred bodily to England. One point was insisted on by General Decäen, and, from motives of policy, accorded by the English commander. This was that the French troops should not be considered as prisoners of war, but should be permitted to return to France at the cost of the British Government with their arms and baggage.[1]

Thus did the French lose, after an occupation of nearly a hundred years, the beautiful island upon which had been bestowed the name of their own bright land, and which in climate, in refinement of luxury, in the love of adventure of its children, had been, in very deed, the France of the East. In the long struggle with England which had followed the Revolution, the Isle of France had inflicted upon the English trade a "damage which might be computated by millions," whilst she herself had remained uninjured, — for eighteen years indeed — unthreatened. She had proved herself to be that which

  1. I think it right and fair to give General Abercromby's own reasons for agreeing to the demand of General Decäen in this particular. In his report to Lord Minto he says: — "I was prevailed upon to acquiesce in this indulgence being granted to the enemy, from the desire of sparing the lives of many brave officers and soldiers, and out of regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the island, who have long laboured under the most degrading misery and oppression, added to the late period of the season when every hour became valuable. I considered these to be motives of much more national importance than any injury which would arise from a small body of troops, at so remote a distance from Europe, being permitted to return to their own country free from any engagement." It will be seen that General Abercromby avows that he was influenced solely by considerations of general policy. His statement regarding the misery and oppression of the islanders, of which ho had no personal knowledge, may be dismissed as gratuitous.