|
|
(iii)
|
|
prior criminal proscription of private and consensual sexual expression between gays, arising from their sexual orientation and which had been directed at gay men, has been struck down as unconstitutional;
|
(iv)
|
|
gays and lesbians in same-sex life partnerships are as capable as heterosexual spouses of expressing and sharing love in its manifold forms, including affection, friendship, eros and charity;
|
(v)
|
|
they are likewise as capable of forming intimate, permanent, committed, monogamous, loyal and enduring relationships; of furnishing emotional and spiritual support; and of providing physical care, financial support and assistance in running the common household;
|
(vi)
|
|
they are individually able to adopt children and in the case of lesbians to bear them;
|
(vii)
|
|
in short, they have the same ability to establish a consortium omnis vitae;
|
(viii)
|
|
finally, and of particular importance for purposes of this case, they are capable of constituting a family, whether nuclear or extended, and of establishing, enjoying and benefiting from family life which is not distinguishable in any significant respect from that of heterosexual spouses.
|
|