tasted the blood.[1] Some Indian tribes of North America, “through a strong principle of religion, abstain in the strictest manner from eating the blood of any animal, as it contains the life and spirit of the beast.” These Indians “commonly pull their new-killed venison (before they dress it) several times through the smoke and flame of the fire, both by the way of a sacrifice and to consume the blood, life, or animal spirits of the beast, which with them would be a most horrid abomination to eat.”[2] Many of the Slave, Hare, and Dogrib Indians scruple to taste the blood of game; hunters of the former tribes collect the blood in the animal’s paunch and bury it in the snow.[3] Jewish hunters poured out the blood of the game they had killed and covered it up with dust. They would not taste the blood, believing that the soul or life of the animal was in the blood, or actually was the blood.[4] The same belief was held by the Romans,[5] and is shared by the Arabs,[6] and by some of the Papuan tribes of New Guinea.[7]
It is a common rule that royal blood must not be shed upon the ground. Hence when a king or one of his family is to be put to death a mode of execution is devised by which the royal blood shall not be spilt upon the earth. About the year 1688 the generalissimo of the army rebelled against the King of Siam and put him to death “after the manner of royal criminals, or as princes of the blood are treated when
- ↑ F. J. Wiedemann, Aus dem inneren und äussern Leben der Ehsten (St. Petersburg, 1876), pp. 448, 478.
- ↑ James Adair, History of the American Indians, pp. 134, 117.
- ↑ E. Petitot, Monographie des Dènè-Dindjié, p. 76.
- ↑ Leviticus xvii. 10-14. The Hebrew word translated “life”in the English version of verse 11 means also “soul” (marginal note in the Revised Version). Cp. Deuteronomy xii. 23-25.
- ↑ Servius on Virgil, Aen. v. 79; cp. id. on Aen. iii. 67.
- ↑ J. Wellhausen, Reste Arabischen Heidentumes, p. 217.
- ↑ A. Goudswaard, De Papoewa’s van de Geelvinksbaai (Schiedam, 1863), p. 77.
