Page:Georges Sorel, Reflections On Violence (1915).djvu/185

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE POLITICAL GENERAL STRIKE
171

by a minority as being so oppressive that it rouses them to violent opposition. Great riotous demonstrations are an indication that the moment is not far off when an armed revolt might break out; Governments which are respectful of the old traditions give way before such demonstrations.[1]

Between the first simple threat of trouble and a riot a general political strike might take place, which might assume any one of a large number of forms: it might be peaceful and of short duration, its aim being to show the Government that it is on the wrong track, and that there are forces which could resist it; it might also be the first act of a series of bloody riots.

During the last few years Parliamentary Socialists have not been so sure that they would soon come into power, and they have recognised that their authority in the two Houses is not destined to increase indefinitely. When there are no exceptional circumstances to force the Government to buy their support with large concessions, their Parliamentary power is very much reduced. It would therefore be a great advantage to them if they could bring outside pressure to bear on recalcitrant majorities which would appear to threaten the Conservatives with a formidable insurrection.

If there were in existence rich working-class federations, highly centralised and in a position to impose a strict discipline on their members, Socialist deputies would not have very much trouble in inflicting their leadership occasionally on their Parliamentary colleagues. All that they would have to do would be to take advantage of an

  1. The clerical party thought that it would be able to make use of these tactics to block the application of the law regarding the congregations; it hoped that some show of violence would cause the Government to give way, but the latter stuck to its guns, and it may be said that one of the mainsprings of the Parliamentary system was thus broken, since there are fewer obstacles than formerly to the dictatorship of Parliament.