Page:HKSAR v. Tong Ying Kit (Verdict).pdf/18

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

-18-

this case and when viewed as a whole, is such display of the slogan capable of inciting others to commit secession under Article 20 of the NSL?

B.2 Count 2: terrorist activities and the elements of the offence

35. Article 24 provides:

「為脅迫中央人民政府、香港特別行政區政府或者國際組織或者威嚇公眾以圖實現政治主張,組織、策劃、實施、參與實施或者威脅實施以下造成或者意圖造成嚴重社會危害的恐怖活動之一的,即屬犯罪:

(一) 針對人的嚴重暴力;
(二) 爆炸、縱火或者投放毒害性、放射性、傳染病病原體等物質;
(三) 破壞交通工具、交通設施、電力設備、燃氣設備或者其他易燃易爆設備;
(四) 嚴重干擾、破壞水、電、燃氣、交通、通訊、網絡等公共服務和管理的電子控制系統;
(五) 以其他危險方法嚴重危害公眾健康或者安全。」

36. Its English translation reads:

“A person who organises, plans, commits, participates in or threatens to commit any of the following terrorist activities causing or intended to cause grave harm to the society with a view to coercing the Central People’s Government, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or an international organisation or intimidating the public in order to pursue political agenda shall be guilty of an offence: