Page:Haaland v. Brackeen.pdf/8

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
8
HAALAND v. BRACKEEN

Syllabus

equal protection or its nondelegation claims. And although the individual petitioners join Texas’s nondelegation challenge to §1915(c), they raise no independent arguments about why they would have standing to bring this claim. Pp. 32–34.

994 F. 3d 249, affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated and remanded in part.

Barrett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined as to Parts I and III. Kavanaugh, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., and Alito, J., filed dissenting opinions.