Page:Highways for the National Defense.pdf/33

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
32
HIGHWAYS FOR THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
Acceptable for
existing roads
Desirable for new or widened roads


Grades (over 500 feet long):
Mountainous areas Any existing 6 percent
Nonmountainous areas do. 4 percent
Curvature :
Mountainous areas:
Heavy grading do. 14 degrees
Other do. 6 degrees
Nonmountainous areas:
Present average daily traffic less than 600 do. 10 degrees
Present average daily traffic 600 and over do . 4 degrees

STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO URBAN AREAS

For the improvement of bridges and roads located in urban areas, the only items of the foregoing rural-area standards that are directly applicable are those for vertical clearance of bridges and underpasses and for the strength of paveme_nts. The only other feature of design for which it is practicable to prescribe a general urban-area standard is the load capacity of bridges, and for that feature the standard H–20 design loading of the American Association of State Highway Officials (see pls. 7 and 8) is recommended as more consistent with the greater frequency of application of extremely heavy gross loads to be expected generally in such areas. The horizontal clearance of bridges, width of pavements, gradients, and curvature in urban areas can be determined only after consideration of conditions peculiar to each location, and shoulders are not employed in urban street construction.

THE APPLICATION OF DESIGN STANDARDS

Some apprehension has been evidenced that the foregoing standards of design for roads and bridges might be arbitrarily enforced on all defense projects without reference to the particular conditions surrounding each project undertaken as a defense facility. No such policy has been given consideration. It would be a very unintelligent approach to the solution of the many problems. For the purpose of securing a reasonable measure of the adequacy of the highways to serve the needs of the defense operations, it has been necessary to use an accepted yardstick. The actual planning of the individual projects is being, and will be, worked out in full cooperation with the State highway departments. The organized engineering and administrative abilities of these organizations are essential to the success of the defense-highway programs and constitute the most important contribution to the strengthening of the national security.

Appendix IV

GENESIS AND CHARACTER OF THE STRATEGIC NETWORK

The strategic network in its present form is not a haphazard or theoretical collection of lines on a map. Its conception goes back more than two decades, and through this period the earnest attention of both State and Federal agencies has been devoted to perfecting the plan of interconnected routes that would best serve civil needs in times of peace and the defense needs in times of a national emergency.