Page:History of Art in Persia.djvu/94

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Construction. 8i ence of wooden frames may be safely affirmed from the thickness of the charcoal layer in question ; but it tells us nothin<^ as to the piecing of the timbers, nor the way they were arranged. We are able, however, to restore them from the notches they have left at the summit of antae , or pilasters, both at Pasargadse and Persepolis, for they give us in section the actual size and profile of the rafters whose extremities formerly rested on this kind of regu- lating beam (Figs. 8 and 24). The timber- plating was very simple, and lends itself to be easily restored in struc- tures of small or average dimen- sions. Sucli would be Fig. 10, No. 6, from which a notion may be gained of what the Palace of Darius was like. In the illustrations / PiVirc. A f « A Kyff — Wood-frame of Palace of Dariiu, showing pillar still ^rigs. 25, 20;, m, staadioc. IsooMttk pfojection. RcctONd byCb. Chipies. Chipiez gives us a view of the entablature seen from below and above, which he has restored on the authority of the pseudo-architecture of the tombs, as well as the notches seen on the lateral face of the antx. Two superimposed beams form the architrave, above which a{>^3ear the ends of the rafters shaped into a series of dentels. Internally, the joists support a heavy bed of earth, kci)t in place, as in Lycia, by a tall cornice made up of tliree or four beams, resulting in a deep salience, penthouse-like over the porch. o Digitized by Google