Page:History of Freedom.djvu/493

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

CARDINAL \VISEMAN

449

charged, however imperfectly, before she was founded; and they are discharged still, independently of her, by two other authorities,-science and society; the Church cannot per- form all these functions by herself, nor, consequently, can she absorb their direction. The political and intellectual orders remain permanently distinct from the spiritual. They follow their own ends, they obey their o\vn laws, and in doing so they support the cause of religion by the discovery of truth and the upholding of right. They render this service by fulfilling their own ends independ- ently and unrestrictedly, not by surrendering them for., the sake of spiritual interests. Whatever diverts govern- ment and science from their own spheres, or leads religion to usurp their domains, confounds distinct authorities, and imperils not only political right and scientific truths, but also the cause of faith and morals. A government that, for the interests of religion, disregards political right, and a science that, for the sake of protecting faith, wavers and dissembles in the pursuit of knowledge, are instruments at least as well adapted to serve the cause of falsehood as to combat it, and never can be used in furtherance of the truth without that treachery to principle which is a sacrifice too costly to be made for the service of any interest whatever. Again, the principles of religion, government, and science are in harmony, ahvays and absolutely; but their interests are not. And though all other interests must yield to those of religion, no principle can succumb to any interest. A political law or a scientific truth may be perilous to the morals or the faith of individuals, but it cannot on this ground be resisted by the Church. It may at times be a duty of the State to protect freedom q.f conscience, yet this freedom rnay be a temptation to apostasy. A d iscovery may be made in science which \vill shake the faith of thousands, yet religion cannot refute it or object to it. The difference in this respect between a true and a false religion is, that one judges all things by the standard of their truth, the other by the touchstone of its own interests. A false religion fears the progress 2G