Page:History of Freedom.djvu/576

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

53 2

ESSAYS ON LIBERTY

the Catholic Episcopate. The jealousy with \vhich he guarded his prerogative in the appointment of officers, and of the great Commission, the pressure during the elections, the prohibition of national meetings, the refusal to hold the debates in a hall where they could be heard, irritated and alarmed many bishops. They suspected that they had been summoned for the very purpose they had indignantly denied, to make the papacy more absolute by abdicating in favour of the official prelature of Rome. Confidence gave way to a great despondency, and a state of feeling was aroused which prepared the way for actual opposition when the time should come. Before Christmas the Germans and the French were grouped nearly as they remained to the end. After the flight of Cardinal Mathieu, and the refusal of Cardinal Bonnechose to coalesce, the friends of the latter gravitated towards the Roman centre, and the friends of the former held their meetings at the house of the Archbishop of Paris. They became, with the Austro-German meeting under Cardinal Schwarzenberg, the strength and substance of the party that opposed the ne\v dogma; but there was little intercourse bet\veen the two, and their exclusive nationality made them useless as a nucleus for the few scattered American, English, and Italian bishops whose sympathies were with them. To meet this object, and to centralise the deliberations, about a dozen of the leading men constituted an international meeting, which included the best talents, but also the most discordant views. They were too little united to act with vigour, and too fe\v to exercise control. Some months later they increased their numbers. They were the brain but not the \vill of the opposition. Cardinal Rauscher presided. Rome honoured him as the author of the Austrian Concordat; but he feared that infallibility would bring destruction on his work, and he \vas the most constant, the most copious, and the most emphatic of its opponents. When the debate opened, on the 28th of December, the idea of proclaiming the dogma by acclamation had Dot been abandoned. The Archbishop of Paris exacted a