Page:History of India Vol 2.djvu/222

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

184 THE SUNGA, KANVA, AND ANDHRA DYNASTIES istic legislation, had necessarily involved the prohibi- tion of bloody sacrifices, which are essential to certain forms of Brahmanical worship and were believed by the orthodox to possess the highest saving efficacy. The memorable horse-sacrifice of Pushyamitra marked the beginning of the Brahmanical reaction, which was fully developed five centuries later in the time of Samu- dragupta and his successors. But the revival of the practice of sacrifice by an orthodox Hindu ruler did not necessarily involve per- secution of Jains and Buddhists who abhorred the rite. There is no evidence that any member of those sects was ever compelled to sacrifice against his will, as, under Buddhist and Jain domination, the orthodox were forced to abstain from ceremonies regarded by them as essential to salvation. Pushyamitra has been accused of persecution, but the evidence is merely that of a legend of no authority. But, although the alleged proscription of Buddhism by Pushyamitra is not supported by evidence, and it is true that the gradual extinction of that religion in India was due in the main to causes other than perse- cution, it is also true that from time to time fanatic kings indulged in savage outbursts of cruelty, and com- mitted genuine acts of persecution directed against Jains or Buddhists as such. Well-established instances of such proceedings will be met with in the course of this history, and others, which do not come within its limits, are on record. That such outbreaks of wrath should have occurred is not wonderful, if we consider