Page:History of India Vol 3.djvu/279

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

BABAK'S SON HUMAYUN 225 would bury himself in his harem and dream away the precious hours in the opium-eater's paradise while his enemies were thundering at the gate. Naturally kind, he forgave when he should have punished; light-hearted and sociable, he revelled at the table when he ought to have been in the saddle. His character attracts but never dominates. In private life he might have been a delightful companion and a staunch friend; his vir- tues were Christian, and his whole life was that of a gentleman. But as a king he was a failure. His name means " fortunate," and never was an unlucky sover- eign more miscalled. The qualities most essential at the time of his acces- sion were a firm grasp of the military situation and resolution to meet it. It was a position that called for boundless energy and soldierly genius. Babar, as we have seen, had not conquered Hindustan; he had only reduced to partial submission a territory comprising little more than what we should now call the Pan jab and Northwest Provinces. He had not annexed Ben- gal to the east, nor the great provinces of Malwa and G-ujarat, now united under one king, to the south. The many chiefs of Rajputana were only cowed, not sub- dued, and in most of the outlying parts of the kingdom the Moghul power was but slightly recognized. Nu- merous Afghan officers still held powerful fiefs, and these men had not forgotten that the kings of Delhi had been Afghans but a few years before. When a member of the deposed dynasty appeared among them in Bihar, there were all the materials for a formidable