Page:History of Woman Suffrage Volume 1.djvu/779

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
A Cowardly Act.
747

children's children were present, and a number of our friends hereaway. Our sister Mary "W. Hicks and her grand daughter May were all of James's relatives from New York. Brother Richard and daughter Cannie could not feel like coming. Brother Silas and Sarah Cornell could not come.

Love to all.
Lucretia Mott.

In 1861 came "the war of the rebellion," the great conflict between the North and the South, the final struggle between freedom and slavery. The women 'who had so perseveringly labored for their own enfranchisement now gave all their time and thought to the nation's life; their patriotism was alike spontaneous and enduring. Tn the sanitary movement, in the hospitals, on the battlefield, gathering in the harvests on the far-off prairies all that heroic women dared and suffered through those long dark years of anxiety and death, should have made "justice to woman" the spontaneous cry on the lips of our rulers, as we welcomed the return of the first glad days of peace. All specific work for her own rights she willingly thrust aside. No Conventions were held for five years; no petitions circulated for her civil and political rights; the action of State Legislatures was wholly forgotten. In their stead, Loyal Leagues were formed, and petitions by the hundred thousand for the emancipation of the slaves rolled up and sent to Congress a measure which with speech and pen they pressed on the nation's heart, seeing clearly as they did that this was the pivotal point of the great conflict.

Thus left unwatched, the Legislature of New York amended the law of 1860, taking from the mother the lately guaranteed right to the equal guardianship of her children, replacing it by a species of veto power, which did not allow the father to bind out or will away a child without the mother's consent in writing. The law guaranteeing the widow the control of the property, which the husband should leave at death, for the care and protection of minor children, was also repealed. This cowardly act of the Legislature of 1862[1] is the strongest possible proof of woman's need of the ballot

———

  1. Passed April 10, 1862.

    Sect. 3. Any married woman, possessed of real estate as her separate property, may bargain, sell; and convey such property, and enter into any contract in reference to the same, with the like effect in all respects as if she were unmarried ; and she may in like manner enter into such covenant or covenants for title as are usual in conveyances of real estate, which covenants shall be obligatory to bind her separate property, in case the same or any of them be broken. § 2. The fourth, fifth, sixth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh sections of the said Act are hereby repealed. 7th. Any married woman may, while married, sue and be sued, in all mutters having relation to her sole and separate property, or which may hereafter come to her by