Page:History of the French in India.djvu/185

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

DUPLE IX APPEALS TO LA BOURDONNAIS. before his arrival at Pondichery, made a special applica- tion for his services. Placed in command of the Pon- dichery contingent, and second only, on land, to La Bourdonnais himself, he had behaved in a manner to give the greatest satisfaction to his chief, and until the time of the capitulation, the relations between the two had been of the most cordial nature. On the 26th, we learn for the first time that some difference had arisen on a point connected with the command of the troops, and that Paradis had left Madras for Pondichery on the 23rd, armed with letters from La Bourdonnais for Dupleix. It seems probable that Paradis, from his position in the force, had been made acquainted with the nature of the negotiations that were progressing at Madras, and that he had pointed out to the Superior Council that, unless they asserted their authority, none would remain to them. The Council were probably in- fluenced by these considerations when they sent MM. Despremesnil, Dulaurent, and Barthelemy to Madras. But on the 28th, they received the defiant letters of La Bourdonnais. They at once wrote to him a letter, in which they recapitulated the arguments they had used against the restoration of the place to the English; told him that M. Despremesnil, the second member of Coun- cil, and then at Madras, would be authorised to take over from him the command of the place, with the Pondichery contingent under him; and concluded with a formal protest against all the engagements he might contract without the knowledge and confirmation of the Superior Council. On the following day, Dupleix des- patched to him a letter written with his own hand — most touching, most entreating in its terms, conjuring him as a brother, as a friend, to give up all idea of ransoming the place, and to enter heartily into the de- signs he was nursing for the uprooting of the English. After dwelling upon the worthlessness of a ransom agreed to by prisoners, and adducing examples from history to M 2