dispute away the "transcendental subject" of Kant, whose relationship to the spiritual Ego of Swedenborg is unmistakable. … This is not affected either by Von Lind's further explanation in Hallier's Recension of his article in the Altpr. Manuscript XXIX., 449f, on these questions. Compare also the favourable comment on Von Lind's article by Güttler, in the Zeitschr. f. Philos., Bd. 104, S. 146–152, and also the there cited article in the Zeitschrift, "Sphinx," 1892 and 1893.
The well-known testimony of Kant in Jachmann, that he "has nothing to do with mysticism," refers only to the practices (of spiritism), and to the Mysticism of the Feelings; it does not apply to the rational belief of Kant in the "corpus mysticum of the intelligible world."
