Page:Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l, Inc. Decision.pdf/23

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
18
IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC. v. LEXMARK INT’L, INC.

Opinion of the Court

stake when it comes to patents than simply the dealings between the parties, which can be addressed through contract law. Instead, exhaustion occurs because, in a sale, the patentee elects to give up title to an item in exchange for payment. Allowing patent rights to stick remora-like to that item as it flows through the market would violate the principle against restraints on alienation. Exhaustion does not depend on whether the patentee receives a premium for selling in the United States, or the type of rights that buyers expect to receive. As a result, restrictions and location are irrelevant; what matters is the patentee’s decision to make a sale.

*** The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Justice Gorsuchtook no part in the consideration or decision of this case.