[VII]
exceeding, when united, the duration of any one of the modifications of the British government: yet the non-existence of the
supposed affinity is at once disclosed by the few words "balance "of orders and judicial independence." The first, indigenously
implying a sovereignty of orders of men, and the second a judicial deptndence upon that sovereignty; transplanted, balance is applied to powers without sovereignty, and independence to confer a judicial powernever thought of in England By the Biitish policy, the nation and the government is considered as one, and the passive obedience denied to the king conceded to the government, whence it alters its form and its principles, without any other concurrence than that of its parts;
whereas, by ours, the nation and the government are considered as distinct, and a claim of passive obedience by the latter, would of
course be equivalent to the same claim by a British king.
Instead of an affinity, a deep rooted contrariety appeared to
the author of these essays to exist, in the reliance of one policy
upon political law and national opinion, and of the other upon
official power, for the control of official power. It seemed to him
as unphilosophical to suppose that official power could be mixed
with human nature without changing its qualities, as that alcohol
would not change the qualities of water ; and that to moderate official power by official power, was something like weakening alcohol with alcohol. On the other hand, he could not discern how publick opinion could perform the office expected of it, unless it was well instructed in those good moral principles, capable of distinguishing between laws or measures consonant to the nature of our policy, and those flowing from avarice, party zeal, ambition, or the errour of its supposed affinity to the British.
The human mind, buoyed up to the zenith of hope upon the billows of the French revolution, sunk with its wreck into the gloom of despair; and philosophers seem inclined to abandon a successful experiment, because they have been obliged to disgorge extravagant theories. It is necessary for the happiness and safety of the people of the United States, to revive political discussion, both to enable them to defeat the frauds of factions, and lest it be inferred from the despotism of France, that the government of their rival is the. last refuge from oppression. The great danger of artisans and agriculturists lies in the legal depredations of the various parties actuated by exclusive interests.
