Page:International Code Council v. UpCodes (2021).pdf/23

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

586 F. Supp. 2d 219, 230 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). Because it has found that Plaintiff’s Lanham Act claim must be dismissed for the reasons set forth above, the common-law unfair competition claim is likewise dismissed in its entirety. E.g., Weight Watchers, 403 F. Supp. 3d at 381.

IV. Order

For the reasons discussed above, it is hereby

Ordered that the motion so deemed by the Court as filed by defendants UpCodes, Inc., Garrett Reynolds, and Scott Reynolds to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff International Code Council, Inc. (Dkt. No. 111) is granted; and it is further

Ordered that within twenty days of the entry of this Order the parties shall submit an updated timeline for trial on the complaint in the copyright action (ICC v. UpCodes, et al., No. 17 Civ. 6261, Dkt. No. 1.).

So ordered.

Dated: New York, New York
1 March 2021

A personal signature appears here

Victor Marrero
U.S.D.J.

23