Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol I).djvu/484

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
444
CONSTITUTION OF THE U. STATES.
[BOOK III.

cessante legis prœmio, cessat et ipsa lex.[1] Probably it has a foundation in the exposition of every code of written law, from the universal principle of interpretation, that the will and intention of the legislature is to be regarded and followed. It is properly resorted to, where doubts or ambiguities arise upon the words of the enacting part; for if they are clear and unambiguous, there seems little room for interpretation, except in cases leading to an obvious absurdity, or to a direct overthrow of the intention expressed in the preamble.

§ 460. There does not seem any reason why, in a fundamental law or constitution of government, an equal attention should not be given to the intention of the framers, as stated in the preamble. And accordingly we find, that it has been constantly referred to by statesmen and jurists to aid them in the exposition of its provisions.[2]

§ 461. The language of the preamble of the constitution was probably in a good measure drawn from that of the third article of the confederation, which declared, that "The said states hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defence, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare." And we accordingly find, that the first resolution proposed, in the convention which framed the constitution, was, that the articles of the confederation ought to be so corrected and enlarged, as to accomplish the objects proposed by their institution, namely, common defence, security of liberty, and general welfare.[3]


  1. Bac. Abridg. Statute I.; 2 Plowden R. 369; 1 Inst. 79.
  2. See Chisholm v. Georgia, Chief Justice Jay's opinion, 2 Dall. 419; 2 Cond. Rep. 635, 671.
  3. Journal of Convention, 67; Id. 83.