Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol I).djvu/495

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CH. VI.]
THE PREAMBLE.
455
§ 473. When, however, the constitution was before the people for adoption, objections, as has been already suggested, were strenuously urged against a general government, founded upon the then extent of our territory. And the authority of Montesquieu was relied on in support of the objections.[1] It is not a little surprising, that Montesquieu should have been relied on for this purpose. He obviously had in view, when he recommends a moderate extent of territory, as best suited to a republic, small states, whose dimensions were far less than the limits of one half of those in the Union; so that upon strictly following out his suggestions, the latter ought to have been divided. But he suggests the appropriate remedy of a confederate republic, (the very form adopted in the constitution,) as the proper means of at once securing safety and liberty with extensive territory.[2] The truth is, that what size is safe for a nation, with a view to the protection of its rights and liberties, is a question, which admits of no universal solution. Much depends upon its local position, its neighbours, its resources, the facilities of invasion, and of repelling invasion, the general state of the world, the means and weapons of warfare, the interests of other nations in preserving or destroying it, and other circumstances, which scarcely admit of enumeration. How far a republican government can, in a confederated form, be extended, and be at once efficient abroad and at home, can ensure general happiness to its own citizens, and perpetuate the principles of liberty, and preserve the substance of justice, is a great problem in the
  1. 1 Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws, B. 9, ch. 1. See also Beccaria, ch. 26.
  2. The Federalist, No. 9; 1 Wilson's Works, 347 to 350; 3 Wilson's Works, 276 to 278.