Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol III).djvu/255

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CH. XXXIV.]
PROHIBITIONS—CONTRACTS.
247

correspondent remedies between private persons. Thus, a state may refuse to allow imprisonment for debt; and the debtor may have no property. But still the right of the creditor remains; and he may enforce it against the future property of the debtor.[1] So a debtor may die without leaving any known estate, or without any known representative. In such cases we should not say, that the right of the creditor was gone; but only, that there was nothing, on which it could presently operate. But suppose an administrator should be appointed, and property in contingency should fall in, the right might then be enforced to the extent of the existing means.

§ 1376. The civil obligation of a contract, then, though it can never arise, or exist contrary to positive law, may arise or exist independently of it;[2] and it may be, exist, notwithstanding there may be no present adequate remedy to enforce it. Wherever the municipal law recognises an absolute duty to perform a contract, there the obligation to perform it is complete, although there may not be a perfect remedy.

§ 1377. But much diversity of opinion has been exhibited upon another point; how far the existing law enters into, and forms a part of the contract. It has been contended by some learned minds, that the municipal law of the place, where a contract is made, forms a part of it, and travels with it, wherever the parties to it may be found.[3] If this were admitted to be true, the consequence would be, that all the existing laws of a state, being incorporated into the contract, would con-
  1. See Sturgis v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 200, 201; Mason v. Haile, 12 Wheat. R. 370.
  2. Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. R. 344 to 346; id. 350.
  3. Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. R. 259, 260; id. 297, 298, 302.