CH. XXXVIII.]
JUDICIARY—JURISDICTION.
623
for I hold it to be perfectly clear, that congress cannot confer jurisdiction upon any courts, but such as exist under the constitution and laws of the United States; although the state courts may exercise jurisdiction in cases authorized by the laws of the state, and not prohibited by the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts.
- ↑ Mr. Justice Washington in Houston v. Moore, 5 Wheat. R. 27, 28; The Federalist, No. 27; id. No. 82.
- ↑ 1 Wheaton's R. 330. See 1 Kent's Comm. Lect. 18, p. 375, (2 edit p. 400.)
- ↑ Id. See also Houston v. Moore, 5 Wheat. R. 68, 09. See 1 Kent's Comm. Lect. 18, p. 375, &c. (2 edit. p. 400 to 404.)—The Federalist (No. 81) seems faintly to contend, that congress might vest the jurisdiction in the state courts, "to confer upon the existing courts of the several states the power of determining such causes, would, perhaps, be as much to 'constitute tribunals,' as to create new courts with the like power." But, how is this reconcilable with the context of the constitution? "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts, as congress may,