Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol III).djvu/85

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CH. XXI.]
POWERS OF CONGRESS—NAVY.
77

thought indispensable to protect it. But the attempt on our part to provide a navy would provoke these powers, who would not suffer us to become a naval power. Thus, we should be immediately involved in wars with them. The expenses, too, of maintaining a suitable navy would be enormous; and wholly disproportionate to our resources. If a navy should be provided at all, it ought to be limited to the mere protection of our trade.[1] It was further urged, that the Southern states would share a large portion of the burthens of maintaining a navy, without any corresponding advantages.[2]

§ 1190. With the nation at large these objections were not deemed of any validity. The necessity of a navy for the protection of commerce and navigation was not only admitted, but made a strong ground for the grant of the power. One of the great objects of the constitution was the encouragement and protection of navigation and trade. Without a navy, it would, be utterly impossible to maintain our right to the fisheries, and our trade and navigation on the lakes, and the Mississippi, as well as our foreign commerce. It was one of the blessings of the Union, that it would be able to provide an adequate support and protection for all these important objects. Besides; a navy would be absolutely indispensable to protect our whole Atlantic frontier, in case of a war with a foreign maritime power. We should otherwise be liable, not only to the invasion of strong regular forces of the enemy; but to the attacks and incursions of every predatory adventurer. Our maritime towns might all be put under contribution; and even the entrance and departure from our
  1. 2 Elliot's Deb. 224, 319, 320.
  2. 2 Elliot's Deb. 319, 320.