13
Militarism constitutes to-day by far the most important cause for the increase of the taxes. Yet the same people, the large landowners, who pose as the best friends of the peasant, are the most active supporters of militarism. To the large landowners militarism offers only advantages. It necessitates enormous deliveries of victuals for men and horses, gigantic deliveries which can be best effected by the large enterprises, and to the sons of the large landowners militarism offers numerous highly paid positions as officers. Militarism deprives the peasant of his best worker, his son, and in his stead it burdens him with heavy taxes and drives him on the market, where he is oppressed by the competition of the large enterprises at home and by the bonanza farming of foreign countries.
The ruling classes see in the peasantry and the military the only safe pillars of the present social system. They fail to see that one of these pillars rests upon the other and crushes it by its increasing weight.
Since the beginning of the capitalist mode of production and until twenty years ago, the decline of the independent petty peasant enterprise has been most marked. The peasant was being reduced to the condition of a wage slave either through his holding becoming absorbed by a large farm or, where such did not exist in his immediate vicinity, through his holding being cut into pieces and sold to his neighbours. This development still continues to a large extent, although it has ceased in some localities owing principally to the aforesaid foreign competition, but partly also in consequence of the migration of agricultural labourers to the towns—a point we cannot deal with here. Statistics, for instance, show us the following results:—
| FRANCE. | 1882–1892. | ||||||
| Size of Farm. | Increase ( + ) or Decrease ( – ) | ||||||
| Under 1 Hectare | + | 243,420 | Hectares. | ||||
| Over | 1 | and under | 5 | Hectares | – | 108,434 | Hectares.„ |
| Over„ | 5 | and under„ | 10 | Hectares„ | – | 13,140 | Hectares.„ |
| Over„ | 10 | and under„ | 40 | Hectares„ | – | 532,243 | Hectares.„ |
| Over„ | 40 | Hectares„ | + | 197,288 | Hectares.„ | ||
| GERMANY. | 1882–1895. | ||||||
| Under 2 Hectares | – | 17,494 | Hectares. | ||||
| Over | 2 | and under | 5 | Hectares | + | 95.781 | Hectares„ |
| Over„ | 5 | and under„ | 20 | Hectares„ | – | 563,477 | Hectares.„ |
| Over„ | 20 | and under„ | 100 | Hectares„ | – | 88,833 | Hectares.„ |
| Over„ | 100 | Hectares | + | 45,533 | Hectares.„ | ||
| (1 Hectare = 2.47 English acres.) | |||||||
Everywhere, however, we find a decline in that agricultural enterprise which, having a separate existence, is independent of capital. The leasing system and mortgaging increase. In the German Empire, the mortgages on landed property increased in the ten years from 1886 to 1895 by about 23,000,000.000 Marks, and the number of farms held on lease rose from 2,322,899 in 1882 to 2,607,210 in 1895, viz., an increase of 284,311.
Finally, we find a decrease in the entire agricultural population. In the German Empire the number of persons employed in agriculture was 18,704,038 in 1882, while in 1895 the number was 17,815,187, or nearly a million less.
Much more telling, however, than in agriculture is the decline of petty enterprise in industry. Here it is absolute.
