Page:Lectures on Ten British Physicists of the Nineteenth Century.djvu/103

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SIR GEORGE GABRIEL STOKES
97

in the position where he was to do his life work. At that time the salary attached to the chair was small; the colleges collected all the revenues, and the University proper had very little for the payment of her officers.

Before his appointment to the Lucasian chair, Stokes had contributed a paper to the Transactions of the Royal Society of London: "On the theory of certain bands in the spectrum." He was now (1851) elected a Fellow of the Society. Two years later he was appointed one of the secretaries, an office which he continued to hold for thirty years. In 1852 he contributed an important paper "On the change of refrangibility of light" for which he received a Rumford medal, and which is considered his greatest contribution to science. Sir John Herschel had discovered a phenomenon, now called fluorescence, in the behavior of a solution of sulphate of quinine when a beam of light strikes on it. Viewed by transmitted light, the liquid appears colorless and transparent like water, but viewed by reflected light it exhibits a peculiar blue color. This blue color comes from a narrow stratum of the liquid adjacent to the surface by which the light enters. Light, which has once produced this effect, though unaltered apparently by transmission through the liquid, cannot produce the blue stratum in a posterior solution. Stokes reasoned that certain invisible rays in the beam are changed into visible rays—the blue rays; which means that certain waves of a length too small to be seen are, by incidence on the molecules of the solution, transformed into waves of greater length so as to become visible. How the change takes place is not known; but what Stokes did establish was that the appearance of the visible blue light was due to disappearance of certain invisible light rays. In the substances which Stokes examined, the change was in every case to greater wave-length; on which he based an induction that the change was always from smaller to greater wavelength, an induction which in more recent years has been overturned.

Soon after he contributed to the Cambridge Philosophical Society a paper "On the effect of the internal friction of fluids