The council of ministers, which was adjourned in consequence of the meeting in the Tennis Court, went over to
the noblesse, and restored in their interest the principles
of the old regime. It resolved that the king should
rescind the recent acts of the Assembly; should maintain
inviolate the division of orders, allowing the option of
debate in common only in cases where neither privilege
nor the Constitution were affected; that he should
confirm feudal rights and even fiscal immunities, unless
voluntarily abandoned, and should deny admission to
public employment irrespective of class. Necker's
adversaries prevailed, and the ancient bulwarks were set
up again, in favour of the aristocracy.
Still, a portion of the great scheme was preserved, and the concessions on the part of the crown were such that some weeks earlier they would have been hailed with enthusiasm, and the consistent logic of free institutions exercises a coercive virtue that made many think that the King's Speech of June 23 ought to have been accepted as the greater charter of France. That was the opinion of Arthur Young; of Gouverneur Morris, who had given the final touches to the American Constitution; of Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence; and afterwards even of Sieyes himself.
On this account, Necker wavered to the last moment, and on the Tuesday morning prepared to attend the king. His friends, his family, his daughter, the wonder of the age, made him understand that he could not sanction by his presence, at a solemn crisis, an act which reversed one essential half of his policy. He dismissed his carriage, took off his court suit, and left the vacant place to proclaim his fall. That evening he sent in his resignation. His significant absence; the peremptory language of the king; the abrogation of their decrees, which was effectual and immediate, while the compensating promises were eventual,and not yet equivalent to laws; the avowed resolve to identify the Crown with the nobles, struck the Assembly with consternation. The removal of the constitutional question to the list of matters to be debated separately
