Page:Lesianawai v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs.pdf/22

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Beech-Jones J

18.

jurisdictional error.[1] This concession extended to accepting that the erroneous consideration was material to the delegate's decision.[2] Those concessions were rightly made. It follows that a writ of certiorari should issue quashing the delegate's decision. The Minister should pay the plaintiff's costs.

  1. ↑ See Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 at 179 per Brennan, Deane, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ.
  2. ↑ Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421; MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 273 CLR 506; Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 96 ALJR 737; 403 ALR 398.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:Lesianawai_v_Minister_for_Immigration,_Citizenship_and_Multicultural_Affairs.pdf/22&oldid=13952165"