Page:Library Administration, 1898.djvu/222

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ACCESS AND PRESERVATION
205

We venture to think that the only duty of the ideal librarian is to provide a catalogue with press-marks appended to the titles of the books, and not, as a rule, to do for readers what they are quite capable of doing for themselves. To make this system work with absolute smoothness it is necessary to have the catalogue arranged on a system of quite Arcadian simplicity, and as the original Ninety-one Rules of the British Museum would be quite a moderate allowance for a modern scientific (German or American) system, the librarian cannot be regarded just yet as a book-bringing automaton.

The different causes that may operate to prevent a reader at the British Museum from obtaining the book he requires were once set forth in Latin by a high official of that institution. This was elicited by a too flattering assertion of Professor Chandler, who was an uncompromising adversary of the proposed class-catalogue of the Bodleian Library, and equally a champion of the Museum catalogue, to the effect that if a book could be found in the catalogue the reader could always get it. We give this jeu d'esprit both in the decent obscurity of the original and an unabashed translation : —

"Ita mehercle, res se habet, nisi liber iste surreptus fuerit ; sen amissus, aut saltern non inventus ; sen obsoletus et concinnatoris indigus ; seu ab alio scriniorum compilatore postulatus; seu ab adolescentulo bibliothecse inserviente, animi recreandi gratia, nulla tessera relicta, ab armario