have wasted that of their first spouses, or else have not gotten of these enough to satisfy them. Thus did Baldwyn,[2] second King of Jerusalem, who making it to be believed of his first wife that she had played him false, did put her away, in order to take a daughter of the Duke of Malyterne,[3] because she had a large sum of money for dowry, whereof he stood in sore need. This is to be read in the History of the Holy Land.[4] Truly it well becomes these Princes to alter the Law of God and invent a new one, to the end they may make away with their unhappy wives!
King Louis VII. (Le Jeune, the Young)[5] did not precisely so in regard to Leonore, duchesse d'Acquitaine, who being suspected of adultery, mayhap falsely, during his voyaging in Syria, was repudiated by him on his sole authority, without appealing to the law of other men, framed as it is and practised more by might than by right or reason. Whereby he did win greater reputation than the other Kings named above, and the name of good, while the others were called wicked, cruel and tyrannical, forasmuch as he had in his soul some traces of remorse and truth. And this forsooth is to live a Christian life! Why! the heathen Romans themselves did for the most part herein behave more Christianly; and above all sundry of their Emperors, of whom the more part were subject to be cuckolds, and their wives exceeding lustful and whorish. Yet cruel as they were, we read of many who did rid themselves of their wives more by divorces than by murders such as we that are Christians do commit.
Julius Caesar did no further hurt to his wife Pompeia, but only divorced her, who had done adultery with Publius
[23]
