trary, the other unreal Our friend's appreciation of
her contemporaries was influenced, at the time of her
writing, by idiosyncrasies of her own which could not
give the law to the general public. These were shown
in her great dislike of the smooth and stereotyped in
manner, and her impatience of the common level of
thought and sentiment. The unusual had for her a
great attraction. It promised originality, which to her
seemed a condition of truth itself. She has said in this
very paper : "No man can be absolutely true to him-
self, eschewing cant, compromise, servile imitation, and
complaisance, without becoming original."
Here we seem to find a confusion between two conceptions of the word "original." Originality in one acceptation is vital and universal. We originate from the start, and do not become original. But the power to develop forms of thought which shall deserve to be called original is a rare gift, and one which even conscience cannot command at will.
The sentences here quoted and commented on show us that Margaret, almost without her own knowledge, was sometimes a partisan of the intellectual reaction of the day, which attacked, in the name of freedom, the fine, insensible tyranny of form and precedent. In its place were temporarily enthroned the spontaneous and passionate. Miracles were expected to follow this change of base, oracles from children, availing philosophies from people who were rebels against all philosophy. Margaret's passionate hopefulness at times carried her within this sphere, where, however, her fine perceptions and love of thorough culture did not allow her to remain.
