Page:Mediation Act 2017.pdf/10

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
10
NO. 1 OF 2017


(i) the disclosure is in compliance with a request or requirement imposed by a regulatory authority and is necessary to enable the regulatory authority to perform its duties or discharge its functions; or
(j) the mediation communication relates to the commission of any offence under any written law or was made in furtherance of any illegal purpose.

(3) Despite subsection (2), a person may, with leave of a court or an arbitral tribunal under section 11, disclose a mediation communication to a third party to the mediation—

(a) for the purpose of enforcing or disputing a mediated settlement agreement;
(b) for the purpose of establishing or disputing an allegation or a complaint of professional misconduct against a mediator or any other person who participated in the mediation in a professional capacity;
(c) for the purpose of discovery or other similar procedures in any court proceedings or arbitral proceedings (as the case may be) which have been instituted, where the person who is a party to those proceedings is required to disclose documents in the person’s possession, custody or power; or
(d) for any other purpose that the court or arbitral tribunal (as the case may be) considers justifiable in the circumstances of the case.

(4) In this section—

“disclosure”, in relation to information, includes permitting access to the information;
“law enforcement agency” means any authority or person charged with the duty of investigating offences or charging offenders under any written law;
“regulatory authority” means any body or organisation in Singapore charged with the public function of regulating entities or individuals, whether under any written law or otherwise.