Page:Memoir, correspondence, and miscellanies, from the papers of Thomas Jefferson - Volume 1.djvu/110

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

94

chaste, methodical in the arrangement of his matter, learned and logical in the use of it, and of great urbanity in debate ; not quick of apprehension, but, with a little time, profound in penetration, and sound in conclusion. In his philosophy he was firm, and neither troubling, nor perhaps trusting, any one with his religious creed, he left the world to the conclusion, that that religion must be good which could produce a life of such exemplary virtue.

His stature was of the middle size, well formed and proportion- ed, and the features of his face were manly, comely and engaging. Such was George Wythe, the honor of his own, and the model of future times.

[Note B.] Letter to Samuel A. Wells, Esq.

Monticello, May 12, 1819. Sir,

An absence, of some time, at an occasional and distant residence, must apologise for the delay in acknowledging the receipt of your favor of April 12 ; and, candor obliges me-to add, that it has been somewhat extended by an aversion to writing, as well as to calls on my memory, for facts so much obliterated from it by time, as to les- sen my own confidence in the traces which seem to remain. One of the enquiries in your letter, however, may be answered without an appeal to the memory. It is that respecting the question, whether committees of correspondence originated in Virginia, or Massachusetts? on which you suppose me to have claimed it for Virginia; but certainly I have never made such a claim. ‘The idea, I suppose, has been taken up from what is said in Wirt’s history of Mr. Henry, page 87, and from an inexact attention to its precise terms. It is there said, ‘this House (of Burgesses, of Virginia) had the merit of originating that powerful engine of resistance, corresponding committees between the legislatures of the different colonies.’ ‘That the fact, as here expressed, is true, your letter bears witness, when it says, that the resolutions of Vir- ginia, for this purpose, were transmitted to the speakers of the different assemblies, and by that of Massachusetts, was laid, at the next session, before that body, who appomted a committee for the specified object: adding, ‘ thus, in Massachusetts, there were two committees of correspondence, one chosen by the people, the other appomted by the House of Assembly ; in the former, Mas-