on such a question, they, too, must assert and dogmatize.
But, how well or ill they fared, may still be known; since the same true hand which reported for the Ladies’ Class, drew up, at the time, the following note of the Evenings of Mythology. My distance from town, and engagements, prevented me from attending again. I was told that on the preceding and following evenings the success was more decisive.
“Margaret’s plan, in these conversations, was a very
noble one, and, had it been seconded, as she expected,
they would have been splendid. She thought, that, by
admitting gentlemen, who had access, by their classical
education, to the whole historical part of the mythology,
her own comparative deficiency, as she felt it, in this
part of learning, would be made up; and that taking
her stand on the works of art, which were the final
development in Greece of these multifarious fables, the
whole subject might be swept from zenith to nadir.
But all that depended on others entirely failed. Mr. W.
contributed same isolated facts, — told the etymology of
names, and cited a few fables not so commonly known
as most; but, even in the point of erudition, which
Margaret did not profess, on the subject, she proved the
best informed of the party, while no one brought an
idea, except herself.
“Her general idea was, that, upon the Earth-worship and Sabæanism of earlier ages, the Grecian genius acted to humanize and idealize, but, still, with some regard to the original principle. What was a seed, or a root, merely, in the Egyptian mind, became a flower in Greece, — Isis, and Osiris, for instance, are reproduced in
