Page:Mind (New Series) Volume 15.djvu/521

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

SYMBOLIC REASONING. 507 If we denote negative infinity by K, negative infinitesimal T)y k, and use the symbol tan x A as an abbreviation for the statement (tanA)*, and similarly for other trigonometrical ratios, we get H (^-fc); (23) tan K (| + fc) ; (24) tan" (|); cot *" (25) cot(|) ; (26) cot(^ - fc) ; (27) (28) sec" (I); (29) cos(|) ; (30) se with numberless others on the same principle of notation. 6. The following is a geometrical illustration bearing both on the ambiguity (as commonly employed) of the word infinity, and on the (to my mind inadmissible) paradox of the non-Euclidean geometry, that a point moving always in the same straight line and in the same direction may never- theless finally find itself at the point of starting. 1 Let a M P straight line of unlimited length, such as AB produced both ways indefinitely, revolve uniformly in the unscrewing direc- tion round a fixed point C, and cut a fixed straight line, also of unlimited length, at the variable point P. Let MC, the perpendicular from C upon the fixed straight line, be our linear unit. As the moving line revolves uniformly round C, the point P moves farther and farther, and with fast increasing velocity, to the right of M, while the angle PCM {or BCM) increases continuously and uniformly. Just before this angle BCM becomes a right angle (the difference being infinitesimal) the straight line MP (which also represents tan PCM, since MC is our linear unit) passes through a 1 The paradox is, of course, perfectly admissible in regard to a line that is virtually straight but not straight absolutely (see 8). Such are some of the so-called " straight lines " of the non-Euclidean geometry.