Page:NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods - 5002.pdf/1

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
WARFARIN
5002
C19H16O4
MW: 308.33
CAS: 81-81-2
RTECS:GN4550000

METHOD: 5002, Issue 2
EVALUATION: PARTIAL
Issue 1: 15 February 1984
Issue 2: 15 August 1994

OSHA: 0.1 mg/m³
NIOSH: 0.1 mg/m³; Group I Pesticide
ACGIH: 0.1 mg/m³; STEL 0.3 mg/m³
PROPERTIES: solid, MP 161 °C; VP not available

SYNONYMS: 3-(α-acetonylbenzyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin.

SAMPLING


SAMPLER: FILTER (1-µm PTFE membrane)
FLOW RATE: 1 to 4 L/min
VOL-MIN:
VOL-MIN-MAX:
200 L @ 0.1 mg/m³
1000 L
SHIPMENT: routine
SAMPLE STABILITY: 93% recovery after 7 days @ 25 °C[1]
BLANKS: 2 to 10 field blanks per set
BULK SAMPLE: desirable; 1 to 5 g

ACCURACY


RANGE STUDIED: 0.054 to 0.24 mg/m³[1]
(408-L samples)
BIAS: none identified[1]
OVERALL PRECISION (ŜrT): 0.056[1]
ACCURACY: ±11.0%

MEASUREMENT


TECHNIQUE: HPLC, UV DETECTION
ANALYTE: Warfarin
EXTRACTION: 5 mL methanol; swirl
INJECTION VOLUME: 20 µL
MOBILE PHASE: 30% of 0.0025 N phosphoric acid and 70% methanol, isocratic, 1.5 mL/min, ambient temperature
COLUMN: C18 reverse phase, 10-µm packing, 25 to 30 cm
DETECTOR: UV absorption @ 280 nm
CALIBRATION: standard solutions of Warfarin in methanol
RANGE: 20 to 200 µg per sample
ESTIMATED LOD: 2.5 µg per sample
PRECISION (Sr): 0.016[1]

APPLICABILITY: The working range is 0.05 to 0.5 mg/m³ for a 400-L air sample.


INTERFERENCES: No interferences have been studied.


OTHER METHODS: This is P&CAM 313[2]⁠ in a new format. Analytical methods for Warfarin in some rodenticides[3] and in drugs[4] are available; these are spectrophotometric methods for bulk materials.


NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition, 8/15/94

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Backup Data Report, P&CAM 313, prepared under NIOSH Contract 210-76-0123 (unpublished, April, 1979).
  2. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 2nd. ed., V. 6, P&CAM 313, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Publ. (NIOSH) 80-125 (1980).
  3. Horwitz, W., Ed. Official Methods for Analysis of the AOAC, 13th ed., p. 85 (1980).
  4. Ibid, 628.