[80]
[81]
[82] [83] [84] [85] [86]
[87] [88] [89]
[90] [91]
[92]
[93] [94] [95] [96]
[97]
[98]
3/15/03
Puskar MA, Fergon SM, Harkins JM, Hecker LH [1992]. Gravimetric determination of airborne dust by using a filter cartridge inside a closed-face, 37-mm polystyrene cassette. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53:692-698. Smith JP, Bartley DL, Kennedy ER [1997]. Laboratory investigation of the mass stability of sampling cassettes from inhalable aerosol samples. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 59:582585. Li S-N, Lundgren DA [1999]. Weighing accuracy of samples collected by IOM and CIS inhalable samplers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 60:235-236. Lidén G, Bergman G [2001]. Weighing imprecision and handleability of the sampling cassettes of the IOM sampler for inhalable dust. Ann Occup Hyg 45:241-252. American Society for Testing and Materials [2000]. Standard practice for controlling and characterizing errors in weighing collected aerosols. Chow JC [1995]. Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. JAWMA 45:320-382. Kogut J, Tomb TF, Gareis MB, Parobeck PS, Gero AJ [1999]. Variability in weight gain of unexposed filter capsules within batches of filter capsules used in MSHA's respirable coal mine dust enforcement program. October 18. Pittsburgh, PA: Mine Safety and Health Administration. Lawless PA, Rodes CE [2001]. Maximizing data quality in the gravimetric analysis of personal exposure sample filters. JAWMA 49:1039-1049. Lodge JP, Chan TL eds. [1986]. Cascade impactor sampling and data analysis. Akron OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association, p. 170. Marple VA, Olson B, Rubow KL [2001]. Inertial, gravitational, and thermal collection techniques. In: Baron P, Willeke K, eds. Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques and applications. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, p. 229-260. Kandlikar M, Ramachandran G [1999]. Inverse methods for analysing aerosol spectrometer measurements: a critical review. J Aerosol Sci 30:413-437. Cooper DW [2001]. Methods of size distribution data analysis and presentation. In: Baron P, Willeke K, eds. Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques and applications. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, p. 667-701. National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement [1992]. Comparison of personal sampling devices for the estimation of wood dust exposure levels. July 1992. Publication No. 92-09. Bartley DL [1998]. Inhalable aerosol samplers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 13:274-278. Vaughan NP, Chalmers CP, Botham RA [1990]. Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust. Ann Occup Hyg 34:553-573. Burdorf A, Lillienberg L, Brisman J [1994]. Characterization of exposure to inhalable flour dust in Swedish bakeries. Ann Occup Hyg 38:67-78. Notø H, Halgard K, Daae HL, Bentsen RK, Eduard W [1996]. Comparative study of an inhalable and a total dust sampler for personal sampling of dust and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the gas and particulate phase. The Analyst 121:1191-1196. Perrault G, Drolet D, Cloutier Y [1996]. Comparison of total and inhalable samplings of wood dust. Presented at American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition. Washington D.C. Wilsey PW, Vincent JH, Bishop MJ, Brosseau LM, Greaves IA [1996]. Exposures to inhalable and "total" oil mist aerosol by metal machining shop workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 57:1149-1153.
207
NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods
