Page:Neatby - A history of the Plymouth Brethren.djvu/17

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE BEGINNINGS OF BRETHRENISM
5

in London an excellent training as a dentist, and was able to support himself by his profession when he was only nineteen. From Plymouth, where he first practised, he soon removed to Exeter and became exceedingly prosperous. From the age of twenty he determined to be a missionary, but the opposition of his wife, whom he married in 1816, kept the project for a long time in abeyance. It was revived about the year 1825 with her full concurrence. Not long before this they had decided to devote their whole property to God, in the sense, apparently, that they should live on a minimum, save nothing, and give away the balance of an annual income of about £1,500. Groves published in this year a tract entitled Christian Devotedness, in which it would seem he taught this line of conduct as a plain evangelical duty. This tract engaged the warm sympathy of Dr. Morrison, the eminent pioneer of Protestant missions in China, and exercised a momentous influence on the celebrated Dr. Duff of Calcutta.

A visit from Edward Bickersteth, of the Church Missionary Society, in July, 1825, finally determined Groves to abandon his profession and qualify as an ordained missionary.[1] With this end in view he entered Trinity College, Dublin, as a fellow-commoner, probably in 1825.[2]

  1. Memoir of A. N. Groves, pp. 12, 13, 32. Miller’s inability to fix the date (The Brethren, p. 23) is due to oversight. His suggestion of so late a date as March, 1827, throws his account of the relation of Groves with the early Brethren into confusion.
  2. Professor Stokes (Contemporary Review, October, 1885, article “Darby”) says, “about 1825”. A correspondent (H. W. P.) in the British Weekly of January 17, 1901 (p. 373), objecting to the influence assigned to Groves in the foundation of Brethrenism, asserted that Groves did not enter Trinity College, Dublin, before 1827, when he was enabled to do so by “a legacy of £12,000 to his wife having set him free from a lucrative business to seek Holy