made in Cass County until July 12th, or more than one week after
the day fixed by statute. Is this a fatal irregularity? If the board
had adjourned without day prior to the return of the roll, a very
different question would arise. In such a case there could be no
equalization or adjustment of the taxes, and no opportunity would
be given to the taxpayer to present any grievances which might
arise upon the return to the only tribunal provided by law to hear
and dermine such grievances. In the supposed case a majority
of this court would hold, for reasons fully stated in Powers v.
Larabee, 2 N. D. 141, 49 N. W. Rep. 724, that the taxes levied in
that year would be invalid for: any purpose. But the record
before us presents no such facts. Here the roll was delivered
to the clerk prior to the adjournment of the board, and after the
roll was returned the board remained in session for two days, and
discharged its functions as a board of equalization. This shows
that the taxpayer was not deprived of his opportunity to be heard
upon matters arising upon the return. Authorities can be found
which announce the broad doctrine that in a case where the
assessment roll has not been returned to the proper office on or
before the date designated by statute for its return that the tax-
payers have no legal notice or knowledge when the return will be
delivered to the proper official, and hence are not bound to give
the matter further attention. But, while we should not hesitate
to apply this doctrine in a proper case, we are of opinion that it
should not be applied to a case where the tribunal of review and
equalization is still sitting at the time the roll is returned, and
had, by adjournments, kept alive a session which was initiated by
a meeting upon the date designated for its first meeting. The fact
that the board was still in session when the roll was returned, and
had by lawful adjournments continued its session from the first
day of its meeting,—the day stated in the law for such meeting,—
was a fact which was advertised to the public by entries made in
the official journal of its proceedings, to which taxpayers have
access. Such board has no lawful business other than such business as is vitally connected with the assessor's return, and hence,
Page:North Dakota Reports (vol. 3).pdf/100
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
60
NORTH DAKOTA REPORTS.