Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/102

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Nullification Advocated and Denounced
83

The Charleston Courier bristled with articles and editorials against the nullification doctrine, and the Charleston City Gazette, the Charleston Southern Patriot, and the Camden Journal kept up an intermittent fire against the heresy.[1]

Excitement was so intense that prudence could not be assured; men were neglecting their business for politics, and boys were being reared as professional politicians.[2] The result was that the press articles did not always maintain a dignified tone nor rely only upon sound argument, but recrimination was common on both sides. The advocates of nullification, the leaders of the "unholy crusade," were said to be only some six or seven lawyers and one associate judge, headed by Dr. Thomas Cooper, president of South Carolina College. The author of the statement to this effect said that he knew not a solitary instance of a planter, merchant, or mechanic who had harangued and urged the people on to disunion. He had considered the leading districts

  1. Typical examples are found in the Courier, March 24, 31, May 12, June 10, 21, July 19, August 16, 1830; Gazette, June 21, July 7, September, and October; Patriot, June 28, July 27, September 8; Journal, August 28, July 3, 24.
  2. Joel R. Poinsett Papers: Joseph Johnson to Poinsett, July 17, 1830. Gazette, April 7, July 7.