Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/175

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
156
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

result proved to be a decisive victory for the State Rights ticket.[1] This was hailed by the State Rights party men as a great triumph, and perhaps with reason, in view of the elections of the previous year. In their natural jubilation they interpreted this victory to mean that the people would no longer be gulled by theUnionist 'prophecies of a disastrous result of this plan. They did not consider that the election proved that the people advocated nullification, as the Union party had said such a result would declare, but they rejoiced that Charleston had intimated a refusal to condemn nullification or any other measure which the state might find it expedient to adopt. The State Rights committee itself published a plea for moderation on the part of the members of that party, to show a love of peace and order, that they might keep the confidence of the people.[2] The Union party immediately held a rally, resolved never to cease to oppose nullification, and claimed that Charleston was by no means ready to sanction an act of nullification by the legisla-

  1. The vote on intendant was typical of the respective average party votes on all the offices. Pinckney, heading the State Rights and Free Trade ticket, received 1,040; Pringle, heading the State Rights and Union ticket, received 932 (Courier, August 30, September 7, 12, 1831; Mercury, September 6, 7).
  2. Mercury, September 7, 1831; Patriot, September 6.