Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/221

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
202
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

tariff law, the State Rights men asked if they thought that a southern convention should resist an act which they considered satisfactory, or should secede from the Union because "a great bill of compromise," as the Union men called it, had been passed. They declared it simply a scheme to put down nullification.[1]

The Union party convention met at Columbia on September 10. It was attended by about 160 delegates from the various districts and parishes.[2] As a result of their deliberations, an address and a set of resolutions were adopted. They denounced nullification, but expressed a readiness to unite with the State Rights party in any constitutional resistance to the tariff. In case of concurrence on the part of Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi, they proposed a convention of the "citizens" of those states, to be elected by districts; the Columbia meeting pledged itself to abide by the measures decided upon by such a convention, and nine of the most distinguished men of the party were appointed a committee to correspond with and act

  1. Mercury, May 14, August 14, 1832; Courier, June 14.
  2. There were from 1 to 18, with an average of 6, from each district or parish (Courier, September 13, 1832).