This page has been validated.
330
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina
Although the oath as adopted by the legislature did not in so many words demand paramount allegiance to the state, the Union men believed that all circumstances pointed to that interpretation. To them the oath in the military bill
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/Nullification_Controversy_in_South_Carolina_-_Map_IX.%E2%80%94Map_IX.%E2%80%94_House_vote_on_the_test_oath%2C_1833.png/500px-Nullification_Controversy_in_South_Carolina_-_Map_IX.%E2%80%94Map_IX.%E2%80%94_House_vote_on_the_test_oath%2C_1833.png)
Map IX.—House vote on the test oath, 1833
was pregnant with a meaning beyond its literal signification; when viewed in connection with the ordinance of the late convention, from which they believed it might be said to have emanated, it became to all intents and purposes an oath of